Journal de bord

mercredi 14 août 2013

Straight Pride UK

Straight Pride website 2013

Ce texte a été censuré par à la demande de Straight Pride UK via une notice DMCA.

There has never been a better time to be gay in this country. LGBTI people will soon enjoy full marriage equality, public acceptance of homosexuality is at an all time high, and generally a consensus has developed that it’s really not that big of a deal what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms. The debate on Gay Marriage in the House of Commons was marred by a few old reactionaries, true, but generally it’s become accepted that full rights for LGBTI people is inevitable and desirable. Thank God.

But some are deeply troubled by this unfaltering march toward common decency, and they call themselves the Straight Pride movement.

Determined to raise awareness of the “heterosexual part of our society”, Straight Pride believe that a militant gay lobby has hijacked the debate on sexuality in this country, and encourage their members, among other things, to “come out” as straight, posting on their Facebook page that:

“Coming out as straight or heterosexual in today’s politically correct world is an extremely challenging experience. It is often distressing and evokes emotions of fear, relief, pride and embarrassment.”

I asked them some questions.

First of all, what prompted you to set up Straight Pride UK? 

Straight Pride is a small group of heterosexual individuals who joined together after seeing the rights of people who have opposing views to homosexuality trampled over and, quite frankly, oppressed.

With the current political situation in the United Kingdom with gay marriage passing, everyone  is being forced to accept homosexuals, and other chosen lifestyles and behaviours, no matter their opposing views. Straight Pride has seen people sued, and businesses affected, all because the homosexual community do not like people having a view or opinion that differs from theirs.

Are your beliefs linked to religion? How many of you derive your views from scripture?

Straight Pride aims are neutral and we do not follow religion, but we do support people who are oppressed for being religious. Only today, Straight Pride see that two homosexual parents are planning to sue the Church because they ‘cannot get what they want’. This is aggressive behaviour and this is the reason why people have strong objections to homosexuals.

You say that one of your goals is “to raise awareness of the heterosexual part of society”. Why do you feel this is necessary? 

The Straight Pride mission is to make sure that the default setting for humanity is not forgotten and that heterosexuals are allowed to have a voice and speak out against being oppressed because of the politically correct government.

Straight Pride feel the need to raise awareness of heterosexuality, family values, morals, and traditional lifestyles and relationships.

Your website states that “Homosexuals have more rights than others”. What rights specifically do LGBTI people have that straight people are denied?

Homosexuals do currently have more rights than heterosexuals, their rights can trump those of others, religious or not. Heterosexuals cannot speak out against homosexuals, but homosexuals are free to call people bigots who don’t agree with homosexuality, heterosexuals, religious or not, cannot refuse to serve or accommodate homosexuals, if they do, they face being sued, this has already happened.

Straight Pride believe anyone should be able to refuse service and speak out against something they do not like or support.

There is a hotel in the south of England, called Hamilton Hall which only accepts homosexuals – if this is allowed, then hotels should have the choice and right to who they accommodate.

What has been the response to your campaign?

The response to Straight Pride’s formation has been as expected; hostile, threatening, and aggressive. Homosexuals do not like anyone challenging them or their behaviour.

We have had support from many people saying that if homosexuals can have a Pride March, and then equality should allow Heterosexuals to have one too. After all, the homosexual movement want everyone to have equality.

Why would you say that heterosexuality is the “natural orientation”? 

Heterosexuality is the default setting for the human race, this is what creates life, if everyone made the decision to be homosexual, life would stop. People are radicalised to become homosexual, it is promoted to be ‘okay’ and right by the many groups that have sprung up.

Marriage is a man and a woman, homosexuals had Civil Partnerships, which was identical to Marriage with all the same rights, they wanted to destroy Marriage and have successfully done so.

If you could pick one historical figure to be the symbol of straight pride (just as figures like Alan Turing, Judith Butler or Peter Tatchell would be for Gay Pride) which would you choose?

Straight Pride would praise Margaret Thatcher for her stance on Section 28, which meant that children were not  taught about homosexuality, as this should not on the curriculum.

More recently, Straight Pride admire President Vladimir Putin of Russia for his stance and support of his country’s traditional values.

How do you react to anti-gay attacks and movements in Russia and parts of Africa? 

Straight Pride support what Russia and Africa is doing, these country have morals and are listening to their majorities. These countries are not ‘anti-gay’ – that is a term always used by the Homosexual Agenda to play the victim and suppress opinions and views of those against it.

These countries have passed laws, these laws are to be respected and no other country should interfere with another country’s laws or legislation.

We have country wide events which our members attend, and ask people their opinions and views, on such event at Glastonbury this year was very positive with the majority of people we asked, replied they were happily heterosexual.

For the record, Straight Pride did not respond to these questions:

“Pride” movements such as Gay Pride and Black Pride were making the argument that the stigma against them meant that proclaiming their “pride” was an act of liberation from oppression. Can being heterosexually really compare?

A problem that Gay rights activists cite is the issue of bullying, and the effect this can have on young LGBT people. Do you think a similar problem exists with straight children being bullied by gay children? 

I will obviously add to this if they do respond.

You can follow Straight Pride on Twitter here and see their Facebook page here.

This article was originally published by Oliver Hotham at but was taken down after a DMCA take down request from Straight Pride.

Oliver Hotham: “The sordid tale of how I was censored by Straight Pride UK.”

1. Le 14 août 2013,

With the current political situation in the United Kingdom with gay marriage passing, everyone is being forced to accept homosexuals, and other chosen lifestyles and behaviours, no matter their opposing views.

Version d’il y a 50 ans :

With the current political situation in France with women vote passing, everyone is being forced to accept women, and other chosen political choices, no matter their opposing views.

Version d’il y a 150 ans :

With the current political situation in the USA with the 13th Amendment passing, everyone is being forced to accept Black people being free, no matter their opposing views.

Hé oui. Dommage pour eux, la “mafia rose” a gagné.

2. Le 14 août 2013,

Que nous disent ces gens de Straight Pride? Que les homosexuels ont plus de droits que les hétéros mais SANS LES NOMMER, bien sûr car ce n’est pas vrai. Critiquer l’homophobie, au même titre que n’importe quel comportement discriminatoire envers les personnes est un devoir, pas un droit, notamment lorsqu’il s’agit d’institutions soi-disant démocratiques. On peut critiquer des personnes homosexuelles pour leur idées ou leurs opinions (et même, leur mauvais goût: ça existe!) mais pas pour leur orientation sexuelle, c’est de la discrimination. Cette nuance est si difficile à accepter?

Je peux comprendre que certains individus abusent parfois de leur statut de minorité pour crier à la discrimination dès qu’ils perçoivent une critique, et surtout quand elle ne porte pas spécifiquement sur leur statut de minorité. C’est quelque chose qui pourrit vite n’importe quel débat. Mais ce que je n’arrive pas à comprendre, et c’était le cas pour les Noirs américains ou les femmes qui ont mené des combats similaires: les droits réclamés par les homosexuels n’enlèvent RIEN aux hétéros: ils peuvent continuer à mener la MÊME vie qu’avant! AUCUNE DIFFÉRENCE! En quoi avons-nous «détruit le mariage»? Le mariage religieux est encore reservé aux hétéros et grand bien leur fasse! On parle de mariage civil ici, donc ouvert à toute la société civile, pas juste aux religieux. (Je serais d’accord pour que le mariage soit exclusivement religieux s’il ne donnait aucun droit civil. Pour tous les autres, homos ou hétéros, on parlerait seulement d’union civile. Libres aux homos religieux de se battre contre leur pape, imam ou patriarche, je me contresacre des religieux car pour le coup, là c’est un choix, un «lifestyle» comme on se le fait dire avec tant de mauvaise foi).

C’est tellement plus facile de critiquer et de mépriser les autres au lieu de se regarder soi-même. Car ce qui fait peur à ces gens, c’est d’avoir à remettre en question une idéologie réactionnaire ( nous on détient la vérité et le reste c’est «mal») qu’on leur a imposée et qu’ils ont tellement peur de remettre en question. Pas facile de faire son coming out, même quand on est straight.

3. Le 14 août 2013,

« Critiquer l’homophobie, au même titre que n’importe quel comportement discriminatoire envers les personnes est un devoir, pas un droit », très bien dit.

Blah ? Touitter !