Nous savions déjà que la tragédie de Newtown était due au manque de place donné à la religion dans les écoles, allié au fait que les enseignants ne sont pas armés en classe.
Nous apprenons aujourd’hui un autre problème propre à l’école Sandy Hook, l’absence de mâles :
There was not a single adult male on the school premises when the shooting occurred. In this school of 450 students, a sizeable number of whom were undoubtedly 11- and 12-year-old boys (it was a K–6 school), all the personnel — the teachers, the principal, the assistant principal, the school psychologist, the “reading specialist” — were female. There didn’t even seem to be a male janitor to heave his bucket at Adam Lanza’s knees. Women and small children are sitting ducks for mass-murderers. The principal, Dawn Hochsprung, seemed to have performed bravely. According to reports, she activated the school’s public-address system and also lunged at Lanza, before he shot her to death. Some of the teachers managed to save all or some of their charges by rushing them into closets or bathrooms. But in general, a feminized setting is a setting in which helpless passivity is the norm. Male aggression can be a good thing, as in protecting the weak — but it has been forced out of the culture of elementary schools and the education schools that train their personnel. Think of what Sandy Hook might have been like if a couple of male teachers who had played high-school football, or even some of the huskier 12-year-old boys, had converged on Lanza. […]
National Review Online, Charlotte Allen: “Newtown Answers.”
Avec la féminisation grandissante du corps enseignant, on peut donc craindre le pire dans le futur…
D’un autre côté, le législateur s’active suite à ce massacre, il s’agit d’interdire les jeux vidéo violents puisque les enquêteurs ont révélé qu’Adam Lanza jouait intensivement à des jeux comme Call Of Duty.
[…] There have been reports that Adam Lanza obsessively played Call of Duty and Starcraft before he went on a shooting rampage at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., last Friday.
Other “violent programming” is also targeted in the legislation, which aims to find out if the programming “causes children to act aggressively or causes other measurable cognitive harm to children.”
[Jay] Rockefeller said he will call on the FTC and FCC to expand their work on video game regulation. “The FTC has reviewed the effectiveness of the video game ratings system. The FCC has looked at the impact of violent programming on children. Changes in technology now allow kids to access violent content on-line with less parental involvement,” he said. “It is time for these two agencies to take a fresh look at these issues.”
The lawmaker also pointed out that responsibility rests with the entertainment industry. “Major corporations, including the video game industry, make billions on marketing and selling violent content to children. They have a responsibility to protect our children,” he said. “If they do not, you can count on the Congress to take a more aggressive role.”
Politico, Brooks Boliek: “Sen. Jay Rockefeller: Study video-game violence.”
Nous retiendrons donc que pour éviter que pareil drame se reproduise, il faut :
- Plus de religion dans l’éducation (mais bien entendu chrétienne, pas une religion terroriste comme l’islam).
- Des professeurs armés en classe.
- Plus d’hommes dans le personnel enseignant (mais bien entendu pas des pédés, des mecs, des vrais.)
- Interdire les jeux vidéos violents.
J’entends “Interdire les armes de guerre” au fond de la salle… Pardon ? Vous voulez restreindre la liberté des citoyens américains, liberté inscrite dans la constitution ? Vous n’êtes juste pas sérieux. Left-Wing Nut!